Cherry Jackpot
Domain registered 15.2 years ago
30 of the 100 points were not available to this operator, because no payout reports have been submitted for it yet. Those points are not awarded and not redistributed, so the most it could have scored is 70.
Paid link. Niekie may earn a commission if you sign up through it. The score is computed before any of that and cannot see it, so a commission cannot move this operator up or down. How we score.
Does Cherry Jackpot pay out?
We cannot say. No withdrawal has been observed leaving a wallet we attribute to Cherry Jackpot, and no player has submitted a payout report for it.
That is not evidence the operator withholds money. It means the question is open, and 30 of the 100 points ride on it, so they are not awarded.
Were you paid?
A confirmed withdrawal from a real player is the strongest evidence this index holds, and it outweighs every automated check on this page. If Cherry Jackpot has paid you, say so and it becomes part of the score.
What we check
What others report
Cherry Jackpot currently has no open complaints on AskGamblers. Specific rating and review count data were not accessible from the search results.
Cherry Jackpot has a Safety Index of 8.6/10 on Casino.guru. Two complaints are documented: one resolved involving verification delays, and one unresolved concerning account lockdown after a $50k win and communication breakdown over withdrawal methods.
Cherry Jackpot imposes a $4,000 per week withdrawal limit and requires KYC verification before first cashout. Player experiences with payouts are mixed, with some reporting quick withdrawals and others experiencing declined payouts or issues related to bonus code disputes.
Gathered from independent sources and shown as published. These are not inputs to the Niekie score.
Terms and conditions
Fail. Terms lean heavily to the house
Cherry Jackpot's T&C contains significant predatory elements including unilateral dispute resolution, aggressive fee structures, aggressive account restrictions, and substantial withdrawal caps, with a questionable Comoros-based license authority raising regulatory concerns.
What that means in practice
- final decisions by casino on all disputes
- player sole responsibility for account access
- casino reserves right to limit/refuse wagers
- 25% administrative fee for non-wagered deposits
- account inactivity clause (180 days) allows balance reduction
- one account per household/IP address only - winnings voided if violated
- document text cuts off mid-sentence at end
- extensive list of excluded jurisdictions (29 countries)
- high $4000/week withdrawal limit suggests large operator exposure
Read from the operator's own terms page on Aug 8, 2026 at cherryjackpot.com/info/terms. We report what it says, not whether it is honoured.
Recent activity
What has changed
Most casino reviews are written once and never touched again. Over the years I have read plenty that still quote a welcome bonus withdrawn two years earlier, and nothing on the page tells you it is stale. A score that never moves is not a steady score, it is an abandoned one. So every change we record for Cherry Jackpot is listed here with the date we recorded it, and you can judge for yourself how closely anyone is actually watching.
Otto Bergström, editor
| 29 Aug 2026 | Score rose from 55 to 68, grade C |
| 28 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 68 to 55, grade D |
| 15 Aug 2026 | Score rose from 66 to 68, grade C |
| 12 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 67 to 66, grade C |
| 9 Aug 2026 | Score rose from 61 to 67, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 8 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 63 to 61, grade B |
| 7 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 70 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 6 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 70 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 5 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 70 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 4 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 70 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 3 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 70 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
| 2 Aug 2026 | Score fell from 90 to 63, grade C because we changed how we score, not because the operator changed |
Last recalculated 29 Aug 2026. Every figure on this page carries the date we recorded it.
Audit ledger
Each time this score is calculated the inputs are sealed into an append-only ledger and hashed. The record below is the current one. Recompute the digest yourself and it has to match, or our arithmetic is wrong.
Show the sealed record and verify it
This is the exact JSON that was hashed, with keys sorted, which is how it is canonicalised before hashing.
{
"casino": "Cherry Jackpot",
"grade": "C",
"pillars": {
"blockchain": 10,
"domain": 15,
"license": 12,
"operational": 6,
"sanctions": 25
},
"score": 68,
"timestamp": "2026-08-29T10:05:57.087Z",
"version": "2.0"
}
Full digest:
b1308c2b5c29aae5f4b8e7bc9bebd2cd1ecb631a9dc5874257edfc04d5a32c85
To check it, hash the canonical record with keys sorted and no insignificant whitespace:
node -e "const c=v=>Array.isArray(v)?v.map(c):v&&typeof v==='object'?Object.keys(v).sort().reduce((a,k)=>(a[k]=c(v[k]),a),{}):v;
const p=require('./record.json');
console.log(require('crypto').createHash('sha256').update(JSON.stringify(c(p))).digest('hex'))"
Get this on the casino itself
The Niekie extension shows Cherry Jackpot's score on Cherry Jackpot's own site, before you deposit. It also holds session and deposit limits you set, and can block around 4,900 gambling sites when you want to stop.